Gaming Performance
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI
-
Nvidia nForce 680i SLI
-
Abit IX38 Quad GT
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Frames Per Second - higher is better
-
Single GeForce 8800 GT
-
GeForce 8800 GT SLI
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI
-
Nvidia nForce 680i SLI
-
Abit IX38 Quad GT
Frames Per Second - higher is better
-
Single GeForce 8800 GT
-
GeForce 8800 GT SLI
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI - Single GeForce 8800 GT
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI - GeForce 8800 GT SLI
-
Nvidia nForce 680i SLI - Single GeForce 8800 GT
-
Nvidia nForce 680i SLI - GeForce 8800 GT SLI
-
Abit IX38 Quad GT - Single GeForce 8800 GT
Frames Per Second - higher is better
Fractional difference would be the term we'd use to describe the core gaming difference between nForce 680i SLI and 780i SLI - at most the difference seems to be less than a frame per second across the board. There's absolutely no noticeable difference, even between these and the Abit IX38 Quad GT in single card mode. You'd get more out of overclocking or investing in a faster CPU or graphics card, and unless you want to upgrade to Penryn there's absolutely no difference between PCI-Express 2.0 and 1.1 on the nForce 780i SLI.
Power Consumption
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI
-
Nvidia nForce 680i SLI
-
Abit IX38 Quad GT
Watts (lower is better)
For virtually no performance difference, is it worth the extra power consumption? The extra Nvidia features might be nice on paper but the nForce 680i SLI was a guzzling beast to start with and it looks like the nForce 780i SLI just adds another mouth to feed, especially under load. In comparison, despite what we've said about the Intel X38 being more power hungry than its P35 sibling, it looks fantastic compared to the nForce boards.
Want to comment? Please log in.